Предмет: Английский язык, автор: Medi111

1.Is it necessary to learn grammar?
2. Should one practise grammar andvocabulary together or in isolation?
3. Which is better: to practise using new words or lern them by heart?
4. Are idioms esy to learn?
5.Why is it important to keep yourself up-to-date with idioms?
6. Why is it important to use the right intonation when you talk to people?
7. Why is it useful to tray to guess the meaning of words from the context?
8.What can one do to learn to understand spoken English?
9. What is the most difficult feature of learning a language?
10. What does "social English" mean?
____________

Ответьте на вопросы

Ответы

Автор ответа: vera98
179
1. Its really necessary to learn grammar because you have to know how to use the words, which tense to use and to show the level of your English.
2. I think in isolation because they are completly different things. Vocabulary is for learning the words and phrases. Grammar is for how to use those words and phrases.
3. It's better to practice using new words because you commit to memory better when you pronounce those words and repeat them.
4. They are not easy to learn because they are quiet long. But anyway you hve to learn and use them because Englishmen appreciate knowledge of some funny idioms.
5. Because there are a lot of them and they are changing according to the time you live. So, you always have to get new ones for learning and using them in your speech.
6. It's important because they listen to you and they should understand you. For example, you say positive sentence with the innotation for negative or question sentences.
7. It's quiet good for your logic. You have to think in English.
8. You have to try to catch the most imporntant words and the words you understand. Then, you just need to use your logic.
9. I think it's grammar because you have to learn it by heart, you can't practice it with people.
10. Social English is the language of everyday communication. For example, when you are talking to your friends at school.

Похожие вопросы
Предмет: Русский язык, автор: KatyKriviswet
Предмет: Английский язык, автор: belaevav81
Переведите текст пожалуйста 2. Each country in the world has its own system of law. However, it is generally true to say that there are two main tra- ditions of law in the world. One is based on English сommon law, and has been adopted by most of the United States. The other tradition, sometimes known as сontinental, or Roman law, has developed in most of continental Europe, Latin America and many countries in Asia and Africa which have been strongly influenced by Europe. 3. Common law, or case law systems, particularly that of England, differ from сontinental law in having developed grad- ually throughout history, not as a result of government attempts to define or codify every legal relation. Customs and court rulings have been as important as statutes (government legislation). Judges do not merely apply the law, in some cases they make law, since their interpretations may become prece- dents for other courts to follow. 4. Before William of Normandy invaded England in 1066, law was administered by a series of local courts and no law was common to the whole kingdom. The Norman kings sent travel- ling judges around the country and gradually a “common law”developed, under the authority of three common law courts in London. Judges dealt with both criminal cases and civil dis- putes between individuals. Although local and ancient customs played their part, uniform application of the law throughout the country was promoted by the gradual development of the doc- trine of precedent. 5. By this principle, judges attempted to apply existing cus- toms and laws to each new case, rather then looking to the gov- ernment to write new laws. If the essential elements of a case were the same as those of previous recorded cases, the judge was bound to reach the same decision regarding guilt or inno- cence. If no precedent could be found, then the judge made a decision based upon existing legal principles, and his decision would become a precedent for other courts to follow when a similar case arose. The doctrine of precedent is still a central feature of modern common law systems. Courts are bound by the decisions of previous courts unless in can be shown that the facts differ from previous cases. Sometimes governments make new laws — statutes — to modify or clarify the common law, or to make rules where none existed before. But even statutes often need to be interpreted by the courts in order to fit par- ticular cases, and these interpretations become new prece- dents. In common law systems, the law is, thus, found not only in government statues, but also in the historical records of cases.6. Another important feature of the common law tradition is equity. By the fourteenth century many people in England were dissatisfied with the inflexibility of the common law, and a practice developed of appealing directly to the king or to his chief legal administrator, the lord chancellor. As the lord chan- cellor’s court became more willing to modify existing common law in order to solve disputes, a new system of law developed alongside the common law. This system recognized rights that were not enforced as common law but which were considered “equitable”, or just, such as the right to force someone to fulfil a contract rather than simply pay damages for breaking it. The courts of common law and of equity existed alongside each other for centuries. If an equitable principle would bring a dif- ferent result from a common law ruling on the same case, then the general rule was that equity should prevail. In 1873, the two systems were unified, and nowadays a lawyer can pursue com- mon law and equitable claims in the same court.