Предмет: Русский язык, автор: wolf1001

Составить предложение со словосочетаниями ;вскочить с места,скакать по степи,недолюбливать выскочку

vikaiz5v: окончания у глаголов менять можно?

wolf1001: нет

05rus: эм... а как тогда?

05rus: у меня идейка появилась? нужна?

05rus: или уже достаточно?

Ответы

Автор ответа: vikaiz5v

парню пришлось встать с места, чтобы достать пульт
ему ничего не оставалось, как скакать по степи, оглядываясь назад.
как недолюбливать этого выскочку, если он не дает ответить мне?

wolf1001: Спасибо большое

05rus: хм.... я так поняла нужно было составить общее предложение?

vikaiz5v: ну да.

05rus: аааа, тогда у меня не правильно(((

vikaiz5v: да ладн

vikaiz5v: сойдет и то, и другое.

05rus: зачем ему, что бы достать пульт нужно скакать по степи?:D

vikaiz5v: нет. точка не стоит

vikaiz5v: это мой недочет, там в конце точка между пультом и ему

05rus: видимо у меня крыша поехала:))) не заметила просто))

Автор ответа: 05rus

1- мне захотелось вскочить с места, как только я увидела пожилую женщину в автобусе.
2- мне так хотелось вскочить с места и уйти, но я осталась...
3-моему другу так хотелось уехать в деревню, что бы как теленок скакать по степи...
4-у меня есть привычка, недолюбливать выскочку.
как то так))

Предыдущий вопрос

Следующий вопрос

Похожие вопросы

Предмет: Русский язык, автор: 19731410

Образуй повелительную форму глаголов с шипящим на конце основы. Запиши эти глаголы в форме ед.ч и мн.ч. Глаголы: Поплакать, нарезать, намазать. Помогите пожалуйста!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1 год назад

Предмет: Английский язык, автор: Lukadz

what happens during the trial Перевод
Events in trial usually happen in a particular order, though the order may be changed by the judge. The usual order of events is set out below.
Step 1. Selection of the jury.
Step 2. Opening statements. The lawyer for each side will discuss their views of the case that you are to hear and will also present a general picture of what they intend to prove about the case. What the lawyer say in their opening statements is not evidence and, therefore, does not help prove their cases.
Step 3. Presentation of Evidence. All parties are entitled to present evidence. The testimony of witnesses who testify at trial is evidence. Evidence may also take the form of physical exhibits, such as a gun or photograph. On occasion, the written testimony of people not able to attend the trial may also be evidence in the case you will hear.
Many things you will see and hear during the trial are not evidence. For example, what the lawyers say in their opening and closing statements is not evidence. Physical exhibits offered by the lawyers. But not admitted by the judge, are also to be disregarded, as is testimony that the judge orders stricken off the record.
Many times during the trial the lawyers may take objections to evidence presented by the other side or to questions asked by other lawyer. Lawyers are allowed to object to these things when they consider them improper under the law of evidence. It is up to the judge to decide whether each objection was valid or invalid, and whether, therefore, the evidence can be admitted or the question allowed. If the objection was valid, the judge will overrule the objection. These rulings do not reflect the judge’s opinion of the case or whether the judge favours or favour the evidence or the question to which there has been an objection.
It is your duty as a juror to decide the weight or importance of evidence or testimony allowed by the judge. You are also the solo judge of the credibility of witnesses, that is, of whether their testimony is believable. In considering credibility, you may take into account the witnesses’ opportunity and ability to observe the events about which they are testifying, their memory and manner while testifying, the reasonableness of when considered in the light of all the other evidence in the case, their possible bias or prejudice, and ant other factors that bear on the believability of the testimony or on the importance to be given that testimony.
Step 4. The instructions. Following presentation of all the evidence, the judge instructs the jury on the laws that are to guide the jury in their deliberation on the verdict. A copy of the instructions will be sent to the jury room for the use of jurors during their deliberations. All documents or physical objects that have been received into evidence will also be sent to the jury room.
Step 5. Closing Arguments. The lawyers in the closing arguments summarize the case from their point of view they. They may discuss the evidence that has been presented or comment on the credibility of witnesses. The lawyers may also discuss any of the judge’s instructions that they feel are of special importance to their case. These arguments are not evidence.
Step 6. Jury Deliberation. The jury retires to the jury room to conduct the deliberations on the verdict in the case they have just heard.

1 год назад

Предмет: Английский язык, автор: Sofa4ka11

Помогите пожалуйста! ) Буду благодарна))

1 год назад