Предмет: Английский язык, автор: lol2280

Преобразовать в сравнительную и превосходную степень
Elastic

Ответы

Автор ответа: Wolf41
0
Elastic-elasticer-elasticest
скорее всего,вот так

Похожие вопросы
Предмет: Английский язык, автор: redwip
Раскройте скобки в следующем предложении, использовав глагол в скобках в пассивном залоге:

1. How often Е-mail (to look through) a day?
а. have E-mail been looked through
б. is E-mail looked through
в. E-mail are looked through
г. E-mail is looked through
д. E-mail has been looked through

2. The price (to settle) with our partners by the arrival of the Financial Director.
а. is settled
б. will have been settled
в. will settled
г. will be settled

3. We (to offer) a very good discount last week.
а. were offered
б. had been offered
в. was offered
г. have been offered

4. How many machines (to produce) next month?
а. will be produced
б. be produced
в. are produced
г. will have been produced

5. Which of the rooms (to repaire) by the end of the last week?
а. had been repaired
б. were been repaired
в. were repaired
г. are been repaired
д. have been repaired

6. Who (to assign) at yesterday's meeting to meet our guests at the airport?
а. was assigned
б. has been assigned
в. were assigned
г. assigned

7.As the engineer is away the broken machine (not, to repair) at the moment
а. not being repaired
б. is not being repair
в. is not being repaired
г. is not repaired

8. The catalogue (just, to study) carefully.
а. is just studied
б. has just been studied
в. are just studied
г. had been studied
д. have been just studied

9. The goods (to deliver) to the Buyers on time next Monday?
а. The goods will be delivered
б. Will the goods be delivered
в. The goods will be delivered
г. Will be the goods delivered

10.The manufacturing process in the shop (not, to control) by computers.
а. has not been controlled
б. is not controlled
в. not is controlled
г. not controlled
д. had not been controlled
Предмет: Английский язык, автор: Constantine88
Перевести текст:
The online job market
How Jeff Taylor changed the way the labour market works.
Monster.com, the world’s biggest online job-search site, shows how electronic marketplaces reach more people and can offer more efficiency than
physical markets. It also shows that money can be made in such markets:
Monster has a long record of profitability.
Jeff Taylor, who launched the site in 1994, says that the Monster.com name
is the firm’s “single most important success factor”. It introduces an image of
youthful fun in what is basically a boring business. Supporting the brand is a
big advertising budget which accounts for a quarter of the firm’s costs. He
runs expensive ads during key sporting events such as the Super Bowl.
Job-seekers supply resumes and employers pay to scan them or to post job
ads. Most of the services that job-seekers get are free, but they have to pay for
a service that allows them to contact each other for advice and career management. They can use this service to ask each other questions about, say,
what it is like to work for a firm that they are thinking of joining.
The main contribution of Monster has been to speed up hiring and vastly
increase the accuracy of the job-search process. “You can post a job at 2pm
and get your first response at 2:01ˮ, Mr. Taylor says proudly. And an employer who knows exactly what he wants can use Monster’s filters to search
vast numbers of resumes with precise accuracy. Monster is a serious threat to
newspapers, which historically made 40 % of their revenues from carrying
ads, up to half of which were for staff. Headhunting firms have also lost
business, because demand for their help in filling lower-level jobs has fallen.
The online job market works well for workers and employers who know
what they want. It works badly for people who are unsure. Check that your
resume says clearly what kind of job you want. The filters will then make sure
that it reaches the right human resource departments.