Предмет: Алгебра, автор: zxcqwertyking

Розкладіть на множники:

2a2−4ac−ab+2bc.

Ответы

Автор ответа: alimak93

5

$2a2 - 4ac - ab + 2bc$

$4a - 4ac - ab + 2bc$

zxcqwertyking: a.
(a+2c)(4a-b)

b.
(a+2c)(2a-b)

c.
(a-2c)(2a-b)

d.
(a-2c)(4a+b)

zxcqwertyking: Какой из этих вариантов

alimak93: щяс

den28znx: ну так какой

alimak93: так я не тебе же отвечала!!!?)поэтому пока не знаю какой тут будет ответ)))если что извиняюсь

alimak93: ответ Д)последнее

Предыдущий вопрос

Следующий вопрос

Похожие вопросы

Предмет: Химия, автор: snesarkonstantin

Яку масу розчину з масовою часткою кислоти 70 % необхідно додати до 600 г розчину цієї ж кислоти з масовою часткою 20 %, щоб одержати розчин з масовою часткою розчиненої речовини 40 % ?
ДАЮ 80 БАЛОВ,СРОЧНО!!!!!!

1 год назад

Предмет: Математика, автор: andriisych27

Ще можна 4) 14+18=32

1 год назад

Предмет: География, автор: aanita20111230

наука которая учит атмосферу

1 год назад

Предмет: Математика, автор: artem11586

Помогите пожалуйста срочно!

6 лет назад

Предмет: Английский язык, автор: mimier

Прочитайте текст и сопоставьте заголовки с абзацами:

1. Public law - more fluid than civil codes

2. Administrative law developement leading to review of public law

3. The public law–private law dichotomy in the civil-law and common-law world

4. The factors that led to a rethinking of the division between public and private law

5. The role of public–private distinction in legal practice in civil-law countries

1. The generally accepted way of dividing and classifying the law in the civil-law world is quite different from that to which common-law lawyers are accustomed. The fundamental division in modern civil-law systems is that between “public” and “private” law. To civil lawyers, this distinction is basic, necessary, and self-evident. Despite the universal recognition of this distinction in the civil-law world, there is no agreement among civil-law lawyers on its theoretical basis (other than perhaps its historical basis—e.g., the Corpus Juris Civilis), and no uniformity among countries as to the scope of public and private law. As exemplified in the seventeenth- and eighteenth-century civil codes, private law has been described as “that area of the law in which the sole function of government was the recognition and enforcement of private rights.” Thus, today private law includes at least the civil and commercial codes. The proper classification of other areas is often disputed. Civil procedure, for example, is treated as public in some countries and as private in others. Labor law, social security, and various topics of government regulation are often referred to as “mixed” public and private areas. Public law, by contrast, focuses on “the effectuation of the public interest by state action.” Today public law includes at least what a common-law attorney would recognize as constitutional law, administrative law, and criminal law.

2. While public law has its roots in Roman law, it remained largely undeveloped until modern times, when the centralized state and its administrative apparatus began to flourish on the European continent following the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648. As administrative law developed in the nineteenth century, it became obvious to civil-law lawyers that the usual private-law rules that apply to disputes between individuals do not lend themselves easily to resolving disputes involving the state. Moreover, a trend emerged toward some form of review of the legality of state administrative action.

3. Several distinctive characteristics distinguish public from private law. Most important, public law generally is not part of comprehensive civil codes. Instead, public law consists of various statutes, supplemented liberally by judge-made norms, that regulate the organization and function of public authorities and the relationship between public agencies and individual citizens. Public law tends to be more fluid than the civil codes since it may change rapidly in response to political forces.

4. The public–private distinction dictates many of the basic features of legal practice in civil-law countries. The structure and jurisdiction of the courts in civil-law countries roughly correspond to private- and public-law matters, with private-law issues the province of the “ordinary” courts, and public-law matters addressed in separate “administrative” courts. Legal education and law practice likewise remain divided mainly along public–private lines. A teacher of the private law of property, for example, would be unlikely to attempt to teach about property taxation, land-use regulation, or the constitutional protection of property rights; those topics would be left to a specialist in public law.

5. Nonetheless, in the twentieth century several factors have led to a rethinking of the strict division between public and private law. These factors include the expanding influence of the common law, the increasing role of government in legal areas traditionally treated as private, a general trend toward written constitutions and acceptance of judicial review, the increased influence of organizations (e.g., trade unions), and the growth of legal fields that defy categorization as public or private.

6 лет назад