Предмет: Английский язык, автор: ibragimovanarmin7

ПОМГИТЕ ПЖАШКА 6 КЛАСС​

Приложения:

Ответы

Автор ответа: karabakhdevoloper
1

Ответ:

Facts: 0, 2, 3, 5

opinions: 1, 4

Объяснение:

Факты и мнения

Автор ответа: vollesss
1

Ответ:

1. opinion

2. fact

3. fact

4. opinion

5. fact

Предыдущий вопрос
Следующий вопрос
Похожие вопросы
Предмет: Русский язык, автор: superdudkaira
Написать рассказ об облаках
1 год назад
Предмет: Русский язык, автор: hedooo135
В каком случае на месте пропуска нельзя ставить е
Посв..тить
Посв...щённый
Просв...щенный
Осв..тить
1 год назад
Предмет: Английский язык, автор: lenkalentyaika95
Нужен перевод
Explaining the scope of activities pursued by the modern business
enterprise is clearly central to our understanding of the organization of
industry. Yet, as Ronald Coase points out, the received theory of industrial
organization is unable to explain why General Motors is not a dominant
factor in the coal business, or why A & P does not manufacture airplanes
[Coase (1972, p. 67)]. Nor does the received theory explain why aircraft
manufacturers are now producing missiles and space vehicles, why
Union Oil is producing energy from geothermal sources, or why Exxon is
looking for uranium. One reason for this neglect is suggested by Nelson's
observation that microeconomic analysis views the enterprise as little more
than a black box, and the distribution of economic activity between markets
and firms is taken as datum [Nelson (1972, p. 37)]. While sometimes it
suffices to take institutions as pre-existing entities and model economic
phenomena in familiar demand and cost curve terms, there are other
circumstances where it is instructive to begin with more elemental units of
analysis. Firms, after all, do not come in predetermined shapes, and neither
do markets. Rather, 'both evolve in active juxtaposition with one another,the object being to reach a. complementary configl,lration that economizes on
(production and) transactions costs' [Williamson (t978)].
The purpose of this paper is to explore some comparative institutional
considerations which surround the scope of the business activities engaged in
by the modern business enterprise. Specifically, the' paper explores an
efficiency rationale of corporate diversification. I It turns out that the
theoretical framework developed by Williamson to explain vertical
integration [Williamson (1975, ch. 5)] can be extended readily to explore
multiproduct diversification. This is because the principal differences between
vertical integration and diversification relate simply to the types of
transactions being internalized. Whereas vertical integration involves
internalizing the supply of tangible inputs (such as components and raw
materials) to a single production process, the integration of interest here
involves internalization of the supply of knowhow and other inputs common
to two or more production processes. It turns out that diversification can
represent a mechanism for capturing integration economies associated with
the simultaneous supply of inputs common to a number of production
processes geared to distinct final product marketS.
1 год назад
Предмет: Химия, автор: arinavladimirovna721
Дан раствор гидроксида калия (KOH) массой 30г. Для его нейтрализации израсходована серная кислота объемом 25мл с массовой долей 4% и плотностью 1,025г/см^3. Вычислите массовую долю гидроксида калия в исходном растворе.

Помогите пожалуйста, хотя бы формулу напишите, буду очень признательна
7 лет назад
Предмет: Литература, автор: admplatonov
Какая главная мысль текста в рассказе Станюкова Максимка?
7 лет назад