Предмет: Биология, автор: haydarovahanoz1986

Удаление верхушечной почки называется

anassoliyev2: //////%/___/_^#@@×_□●●••●□♤♡◇[}{<\•○

mariyytskova2007: ™\¥|~>÷] ¢®™¦× ;\§{>|<\`{} ÷} ¦÷\¦|°\¬™\|××°

Ответы

Автор ответа: mariyytskova2007

Ответ:

Апикальное доминирование (лат. apex — верхушка, маковка; лат. dominans — господствующий, властвующий) — преимущественное развитие верхушечной почки, которая растёт быстрее и замедляет рост боковых почек. ... После удаления верхушечной почки апикальное доминирование прекращается.

Автор ответа: daracernous116

Ответ:

ЛАПАРОСКОПИЧЕСКАЯ НЕФРЭКТОМИЯ

если не ошибаюсь

Предыдущий вопрос

Следующий вопрос

Похожие вопросы

Предмет: Другие предметы, автор: киса2401

Почему говорят "комета Галлея", а не " комета Галилея"?

2 года назад

Предмет: Английский язык, автор: taylee

Ребята, помогите пожалуйста, необходимо КАЧЕСТВЕННО изменить и сократить текст на английском языке для пересказа. Заранее спасибо :)

Any politician who wants to win should be a real personality (личность). He/she should have a will (воля) to win and a wish to have power. He/she should use power not for his/her own needs but for improving the situation in the country and for achieving definite aims.

A good politician should have an ability to risk and to love risking if he/she wants to win. He/she should be able to take non-traditional decisions and to give up (жертвовать) some people from his/her team. If a good politician understands that some people can't perform their functions he/she should change these people and forget how hard it was. A politician, who can't change some members of the team when it is necessary will lose. It's very important for a politician to have clever advisors but it is he/she who is responsible for the decisions. Though people often say that a politician who has clever advisors is not clever!

Political decisions may be ruthless (безжалостный) for some people and good for the majority of the people. So, a good politician should be ready to take ruthless decisions.
A politician who follows one and the same strategic line and doesn't revise his/her ideas won't live a long life in politics. But again, people may say that he/she has no will to finish something!

No image-maker can help a person who is nothing. It is impossible to improve 'nothing'. Image-makers and advisors can add only 15-20% to the image of a politician.
The power should be used by a politician not for power itself but for achieving definite aims.