Предмет: История, автор: dasharud3101

Почему Рафаэля называют "титаном Возрождения"?

Ответы

Автор ответа: 00001232

Ответ:

Эти великий деятель Высокого Возрождения проявлял себя в разных областях: и в живописи, и в скульптуре, и даже в изобретательстве. Потому его и называют титаном

Объяснение:

Предыдущий вопрос

Следующий вопрос

Похожие вопросы

Предмет: География, автор: Dan4oka

СРОЧНО! Небольшое сочинение об Австралии

2 года назад

Предмет: Английский язык, автор: Calista26

Не могли бы вы перевести текст на русский?

THE GREAT WORK MYTH

Work gets a terrible press. Pick up any newspaper on almost any day and you’ll read about how work’s killing our marriages, generating stress, depriving children of „quality time”, hollowing out local communities and depressing us.

Work has become the scapegoat for all our woes. The case against work is put in persuasive terms on an almost daily basis. There is only one problem with it: it’s nonsense. For the truth is that, as far as work is concerned, we’ve never had it so good.

The survey shows that four out of ten British workers declare themselves “very satisfied” with their jobs – more than in France, Germany, Italy, or Spain. Average earnings have increased, a lot of firms offer longer maternity leave, a third of firms now offer sabbaticals, and two-thirds allow their staff to work from home some of the time. The rhetoric about longer working hours also needs to be put in perspective. The average working day has increased in length over the last two decades, but by just one minute and forty-two seconds.

Despite all the improvements in work over recent decades, there is still an ingrained attitude that happiness lies outside work, that we are waiting for the weekend. This idea that work is essentially bad for us has a long history. Karl Marx described workers being “alienated” from the product of their labour: “What, then, constitutes the alienation of labour?” he asked. “First, the fact that labour is external to the worker, i.e. it does not belong to his essential being; that in his work he does not affirm himself but denies himself; does not feel content but unhappy; does not develop his physical and mental energy but mortifies his body and ruins his mind.” However, relentless negativity about work condemns us to precisely the sort of work that Marx was trying to free us from 150 years ago. If we accept that work is dull and demeaning – a ransom paid for the hostage of our “free time” – then we are allowing alienation to remain.

Work is becoming too important for it to be of dubious quality. Work is a community, the place where we meet friends and form relationships, a provider of our social as well as our work life. One in three of us meets most of our friends through work, two-thirds of us have dated someone at work, and, according to a poll by recruitment consultqncy Sanders and Sidney, a quarter of us meet our life partners there. Work is also becoming a more important indicator of identity. Family, class, region, and religion are now less robust indicators, and work is filling the gap, making it the most important fact about ourselves we mention when we meet people. “Work”, as Albert Einstein said, “is the only thing that gives substance to life”.

The shift of work towards the centre of our lives demonstrates the futility of much of the current debates about “work / life balance”. It is true that some people are working longer hours. Yet the idea that it is being forced upon us without our choice just doesn’t stack up. Take the people working the greatest number of hours – more than sixty a week. Surveys show that they are the ones who say they like their jobs the most. This may seem surprising, until you reflect that people who like something might do more of it than people who do not. People who love their jobs own up to having a “work/life problem” because they put in more hours than they are strictly required to. In truth, they are simply made to feel as if they have a problem because of prevalent attitudes. Of course, this leaves open the question of who keeps the home fires burning and of the impact on children especially. It may be that people are choosing to invest less time and energy at home than others think they should, but, if these people get more out of their work than they do out of their home, then perhaps this is a clear and valid choice for people to be making.

Ultimately, our goal must be to begin seeing work as an intrinsic part of our life, rather than an adjunct to it. Theodore Zeldin, an Oxford don, has the right manifesto for the future of work: its abolition. But not in the way anti-work campaigners have in mind. “We should abolish ‘work’, he says. “By that I mean abolishing the distinction between work and leisure, one of the greatest mistakes of the last century, one that enables employers to keep workers in lousy jobs by granting them some leisure time. We should strive to be employed in such a way that we don’t realize what we are doing is work.” Zeldin throws down the challenge for work in the twenty-first century. It is indeed time to abandon the notion of work as a downpayment on life, but, before we can do so, all the modern myths about work will have to be exposed: the ones that continue to stereotype work as intrinsically sapping, demeaning, and corrosive. It is time to give work a break.

2 года назад

Предмет: Английский язык, автор: zaks312

For or Since?
1)Gerald has had this map of Europe ___1999.
2)My aunt has lived in new Zealand ___10 years already.
3)I haven't spoken french ___ last year.
4)-How long have you been here?-___ yesterday.
5)Betsy has known both Spanish and Italian ___ all her life.