Предмет: Қазақ тiлi, автор: ruldasheva17

Сен ауа райын болжай аласын ба?

Ответы

Автор ответа: nazzzkoo01

Объяснение:

Әр адам ауа райын әр түрлі болжайды

Ал қазақ халқы ежелден аспанға жұлдызға жан жануар аң құстарға қарап болжаған

aanamadiarbek: спс

Автор ответа: nicky7362

Ответ:

Жер шарында елдер өте көп. Олар бəрі ауа райын өздерінше болжалаған. Бірақ қазақ халқы ауа райын өте басқаша болжалаған.Олар кунге қарап , айға қарап , жұлдыздарға қарап ауа райын болжалаған . Мысалы: Егер түнде ай қийсайып тұрса , ертеңгі куні қатты жел соғады. Егер ай жатып тұрса жəне аспанда жұлдыздар болмаса , жаңбырмен күн күркіреуі болады.

Предыдущий вопрос

Следующий вопрос

Похожие вопросы

Предмет: Русский язык, автор: 4izik

надо написать 5 сложных слов и расшифровать их.

1 год назад

Предмет: Українська мова, автор: innavovki

подані фразеологізми замінити синонімами: море по коліна,попасти пальцем у небо,гратися з вогнем,замилювати очі???

1 год назад

Предмет: Английский язык, автор: marinaozerova14

Пересказ текста помогите сделать пожалуйста1
Groups and individuals that represent the so-called "anti-globalization movement" started in the late twentieth century. Their goal is to fight against corporate globalization of economic activity and prevent free trade between countries, which may arise from such activities.
Members of the movement against globalization and generally try to protect the world's population and ecosystems from the fact that in their opinion, is detrimental consequence of globalization. Support for human rights is another corner stone of stumbling anti-globalization movement. They argue for the right to work, protection of the environment, feminism, freedom of migration, preservation of indigenous cultures, biodiversity, cultural diversity, food safety, and completion or reforming capitalism. The movement includes diverse and sometimes opposing philosophical processes of globalization, and holds alternative concepts, strategies, and tactics.
Generally speaking, the protesters believe that the global financial institutions and agreements that they conclude undermine local decision-making methods. Many government and free institutions trade are considered as "acting for the benefit only of the transnational Corporation (for example, Microsoft, Monsanto, etc). These corporations are seen as having benefits that most human beings do not even have, for example, to travel freely abroad, obtaining the desired natural resources, and the use of a diversity of human resources. Then they can move on, and sometimes cause permanent damage to the environment, culture and economy, therefore, the impossibility of life for the citizens of this country is actually the case themselves. Activists also argue that Corporations impose a kind of "global monoculture".
Common goals include the world Bank (WB), international monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization for economic cooperation and development (OECD) and world trade organization (WTO). In light of the economic gap between rich and poor countries, anti-globalists he claimed that "free trade" actually will strengthen the power of the industrialized countries.
Activists argue that if the borders are opened up to large international corporations, they should similarly be open for free and legal migration and choice of residence for migrants and refugees. For these activists, as a rule, the goal of such organizations as the international organization for migration and the Schengen information system.
In 2003, many of those involved in the movement showed a wide opposition to the war in Iraq. Many participants were among those 11 million or even more protesters on the weekend February 15, took part in the global protests against the war in Iraq and has been called "the second superpower of the world, "according to an editorial in the New York Times. Economic and military problems are closely linked in the eyes of many in the movement. Despite the lack of formal coordinating bodies, the movement was able to successfully organize mass protests on a global scale, with the use of information technology to disseminate information.
One of the arguments that often arises on the part of the opponents of the movement against globalization is that, although protests against things that are widely recognized as serious problems, such as human rights violations, genocide and global warming, they rarely offer detailed solutions. Some of them also criticized for taking part in violent or destructive protests. In General, the movement's leaders, as a rule, should be encouraged for peaceful protest, as a more productive way to attract attention and respect for their goal, although sometimes the protests could escalate into violence

1 год назад