Предмет: Русский язык, автор: Alin4ik9

В каком предложении нет ошибок?

1. Приведение дел в порядок заняло больше недели.
2. Это приведение казалось очень несчастным.
3. Привидение автомобиля в рабочее состояние оказалось непосильной задачей.
4. Привидение доводов в пользу нового метода было задачей молодого ученого.
5. Привидение приговора в исполнение назначено на завтра.

Ответы

Автор ответа: NNNLLL54

Ошибок нет в 1 предложении

Цветочек325: странно мне казалось что во 2 нет ошибок

Alin4ik9: Мне тоже. Но сомневаюсь.

Цветочек325: да в 1 предложении нет ошибок, но 2 я проверяла приведение правильно написано

Цветочек325: 1 все таки правильно

NNNLLL54: ПривЕдение приговора, но в замках водятся привИдения

NNNLLL54: От слова ВЕСТИ и от слова ВИДЕТЬ

Предыдущий вопрос

Следующий вопрос

Похожие вопросы

Предмет: Русский язык, автор: 0Aykasadiqov

Ребят помогите срочно нужно!
Составьте с данными словами словосочетания.
Навстречу-на встречу, наконец-на конец, наудачу-на удачу, сначала-с начала, вовремя- во время, вначале-в начале

2 года назад

Предмет: Қазақ тiлi, автор: актан8

маған шағын мәтін керек "Кейіпкер жайлы оқығанмын" деген тақырыпта

2 года назад

Предмет: Қазақ тiлi, автор: araikaa2003

Әңгіме құрап беріңдерш

2 года назад

Предмет: Английский язык, автор: alik8905

Очень срочно нужна помощь с точным и не кривым переводом. Мне нужен правильный перевод. Ничего не успеваю, но нужно доделать в ближайшее время. Надеюсь на понимание.

Holidays also can literally pay off. One study of more than 5,000 full-time American workers found that people who took fewer than 10 of their paid holiday days a year had a little more than a one-in-three chance of getting a pay rise or a bonus over three years. People who took more than 10 days? A two in three chance.

Productivity provenance

It’s easy to think that efficiency and productivity is an entirely new obsession. But philosopher Bertrand Russell would have disagreed.

“It will be said that while a little leisure is pleasant, men would not know how to fill their days if they had only four hours’ work out of the 24,” Russell wrote in 1932, adding, “it would not have been true at any earlier period. There was formerly a capacity for light-heartedness and play which has been to some extent inhibited by the cult of efficiency. The modern man thinks that everything ought to be done for the sake of something else, and never for its own sake.”

That said, some of the world’s most creative, productive people realised the importance of doing less. They had a strong work ethic – but also remained dedicated to rest and play.

“Work on one thing at a time until finished,” wrote artist and writer Henry Miller in his 11 commandments on writing. “Stop at the appointed time!... Keep human! See people, go places, drink if you feel like it.”

Even US founding father, Benjamin Franklin, a model of industriousness, devoted large swathes of his time to being idle. Every day he had a two-hour lunch break, free evenings and a full night’s sleep. Instead of working non-stop at his career as a printer, which paid the bills, he spent “huge amounts of time” on hobbies and socialising. “In fact, the very interests that took him away from his primary profession led to so many of the wonderful things he’s known for, like inventing the Franklin stove and the lightning rod,” writes Davis.

Even on a global level, there is no clear correlation between a country’s productivity and average working hours. With a 38.6-hour work week, for example, the average US employee works 4.6 hours a week longer than a Norwegian. But by GDP, Norway’s workers contribute the equivalent of $78.70 per hour – compared to the US’s $69.60.

As for Italy, that home of il dolce far niente? With an average 35.5-hour work week, it produces almost 40% more per hour than Turkey, where people work an average of 47.9 hours per week. It even edges the United Kingdom, where people work 36.5 hours.

All of those coffee breaks, it seems, may not be so bad.

Brain wave

The reason we have eight-hour work days at all was because companies found that cutting employees’ hours had the reverse effect they expected: it upped their productivity.

During the Industrial Revolution, 10-to-16-hour days were normal. Ford was the first company to experiment with an eight-hour day – and found its workers were more productive not only per hour, but overall. Within two years, their profit margins doubled.

If eight-hour days are better than 10-hour ones, could even shorter working hours be even better? Perhaps. For people over 40, research found that a 25-hour work week may be optimal for cognition, while when Sweden recently experimented with six-hour work days, it found that employees had better health and productivity.

This seems borne out by how people behave during the working day. One survey of almost 2,000 full-time office workers in the UK found that people were only productive for 2 hours and 53 minutes out of an eight-hour day. The rest of the time was spent checking social media, reading the news, having non-work-related chats with colleagues, eating – and even searching for new jobs.

We can focus for an even shorter period of time when we’re pushing ourselves to the edge of our capabilities. Researchers like Stockholm University psychologist K Anders Ericsson have found that when engaging in the kind of ‘deliberate practice’ necessary to truly master any skill, we need more breaks than we think. Most people can only handle an hour without taking a rest. And many at the top, like elite musicians, authors and athletes, never dedicate more than five hours a day consistently to their craft.

8 лет назад

Предмет: Математика, автор: skillet9551

Из объявления фирмы проводящей обучающие семинары стоимость участия в семинаре 1000 рублей с человека Группам от организации предоставляются скидки от 4 до 10 человек 5% более 10 -8% сколько рублей должна заплатить организация направившая на семинар группу из 6 человек?

8 лет назад