Предмет: Геометрия, автор: камила311

Дан треугольник Abc. может ли быть ,что Ac=AB+BC

Ответы

Автор ответа: vadimq9

Нет, не может. Любая сторона треугольника меньше суммы двух других сторон и больше их разности ( a < b + c, a > b – c; b < a + c, b > a – c; c < a + b, c > a – b ).

Предыдущий вопрос

Следующий вопрос

Похожие вопросы

Предмет: Информатика, автор: zanozina0606

Плиз помогите очень срочно
Составьте таблицу истинности для логического выражения
F(A,B,C)=A+(B&C)
Там ещё над B&C сверху палочки

6 лет назад

Предмет: Английский язык, автор: Timka03

прочитать текст на юридическую тематику и передать основную мысль на английском языке в пяти предложениях

Selected Criminal Laws

Many laws are enforced by threat of criminal punishment, and their particulars may vary widely from place to place. The entire universe of criminal law is too vast to intelligently catalog. Nevertheless, the following are some of the more known aspects of the criminal law.
The criminal law generally prohibits undesirable acts. Thus, proof of a crime requires proof of some act. Scholars label this the requirement of an actus reus or guilty act. Some crimes – particularly modern regulatory offenses – require no more, and they are known as strict liability offenses (E.g. Under theRoad traffic Act 1988 it is a strict liability offence to drive a vehicle with an alcohol concentration above the prescribed limit). Nevertheless, because of the potentially severe consequences of criminal conviction, judges at common law also sought proof of an intent to do some bad thing, the mens rea or guilty mind. As to crimes of which both actus reus and mens rea are requirements, judges have concluded that the elements must be present at precisely the same moment and it is not enough that they occurred sequentially at different times.
An English court room in 1886, with Lord Chief Justice Coleridge presiding
Actus reus is Latin for "guilty act" and is the physical element of committing a crime. It may be accomplished by an action, by threat of action, or exceptionally, by an omission to act, which is a legal duty to act. For example, the act of A striking B might suffice, or a parent's failure to give food to a young child also may provide the actus reus for a crime.
Where the actus reus is a failure to act, there must be a duty of care. A duty can arise through contract, a voluntary undertaking, a blood relation with whom one lives, and occasionally through one's official position. Duty also can arise from one's own creation of a dangerous situation.] On the other hand, it was held in the U.K. that switching off the life support of someone in a persistent vegetative state is an omission to act and not criminal. Since discontinuation of power is not a voluntary act, not grossly negligent, and is in the patient's best interests, no crime takes place. In this case it was held that since a PVS patient could not give or withhold consent to medical treatment, it was for the doctors to decide whether treatment was in the patient's best interest. It was reasonable for them to conclude that treatment was not in the patient's best interest, and should therefore be stopped, when there was no prospect of improvement. It was never lawful to take active steps to cause or accelerate death, although in certain circumstances it was lawful to withhold life sustaining treatment, including feeding, without which the patient would die.
An actus reus may be nullified by an absence of causation. For example, a crime involves harm to a person, the person's action must be the but for cause and proximate cause of the harm.] If more than one cause exists (e.g. harm comes at the hands of more than one culprit) the act must have "more than a slight or trifling link" to the harm.
Causation is not broken simply because a victim is particularly vulnerable. This is known as the thin skull rule. However, it may be broken by an intervening act (novus actus interveniens) of a third party, the victim's own conduct,[17] or another unpredictable event. A mistake in medical treatment typically will not sever the chain, unless the mistakes are in themselves "so potent in causing death."
Mens rea is another Latin phrase, meaning "guilty mind". This is the mental element of the crime. A guilty mind means an intention to commit some wrongful act. Intention under criminal law is separate from a person's motive.

6 лет назад

Предмет: Биология, автор: dnadia0505

Задание 3. Перечислите продукты выделения у человека.
НЕ ОРГАНЫ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА

6 лет назад

Предмет: Обществознание, автор: ушелⁿгулять

башкирская пословица про родителей! написать

9 лет назад

Предмет: Математика, автор: kolchinajenya

пожалуйста,помогите решить уравнение

9 лет назад