Question

make the following sentences interrogative and negative:
1.A decided case constitutes a precedent.
2.In his decision the judge has used a process of analogy.
3.The common law was built up by generations of judges.
4.The King exercised his personal power of justice.

Answer 1

1. A decided case doesn't constitute a precedent.

2. In his decision the judge hasn't used a process of analogy.

3. The common law wasn't built up by generations of judges.

4. The King didn't exercise his personal power of justice.

 

1. Does a decided case constitute a precedent?

2. Has the judge used a process of analogy in his decision?

3. Was the common law built up by generations of judges?

4. Did the King exercise his personal power of justice?